Software Evaluation
Vena vs. Anaplan: Comparing Features, Integrations, Reviews and More
Compare Vena and Anaplan's solutions for FP&A teams. Make an informed decision with our detailed analysis of features, pricing and support.
Main Content
For many, Anaplan has become synonymous with enterprise planning. Its multidimensional modeling engine allows finance, sales, HR, and operations teams to plan in one environment—something spreadsheets or smaller platforms can’t match. For Fortune 500 companies, it’s often the go-to choice for connected planning at scale.
But power comes with trade-offs. Many Anaplan users end up wrestling with challenges like:
Complex implementations that take months (or even years) to fully realize value
Resource-heavy administration, where only certified model builders can make changes
Opaque pricing, leaving CFOs unsure about long-term costs as use cases expand
Steep learning curves, which slow adoption across users (especially those outside of finance)
If you’re a large enterprise with complex planning needs, Anaplan can handle the scale, but at the cost of flexibility, speed, and ROI. Many global organizations today are looking for platforms that deliver enterprise-level capabilities without the heavy implementation burden.
That’s why finance leaders are evaluating alternatives—platforms that deliver real-time collaboration, stronger usability, faster time-to-value, or clearer pricing models without sacrificing the control and scalability required for modern planning.
In this guide, we’ll break down nine Anaplan competitors—ranging from Excel-native platforms like Vena to emerging browser-based tools like Pigment—so you can find the right fit for your business’s unique needs.
Anaplan is often described as the gold standard for connected planning. But the platform’s steep learning curve, high price tag, and reliance on specialist model builders can slow down adoption and keep day-to-day users at arm’s length.
And while it’s built for scale, smaller or mid-market organizations often find themselves paying for functionality they don’t need—or waiting months before they see a return.
Anaplan’s flexibility comes at the cost of complexity, and most deployments require months of design, testing and iteration before they deliver usable outputs. That means finance leaders often face a long gap between purchase and real ROI.
Beyond timelines, implementation typically involves external consultants or certified model builders, as they’re known. This dependence drives up costs and leaves many teams with a system they can’t fully control without ongoing outside help. Instead of accelerating transformation, the rollout itself can become a project that drags on and consumes more resources than expected.
User Insights:
“Average model development is suggested to be 13 weeks, but even moderately complex projects took 12 months and an army to develop, and then did not meet expectations.” - Reddit User
“You need a dedicated team to manage and maintain the model. Implementation is very hard so you need a very strong implementation consultant, which cost $$$$. We just gave up on Anaplan after trying to implement for 2 years.” Reddit User
Bottom Line:
If your organization has the scale and patience for a long runway, Anaplan’s implementation can pay off. But for teams that need speed, agility, and self-sufficiency, the upfront cost in time, money, and resources is hard to justify.
Anaplan’s flexibility comes with a catch: it’s not easy to manage without certified model builders. Many finance teams discover that even small adjustments—like adding a new reporting dimension or tweaking formulas—require advanced skills. This creates a dependency on either a dedicated internal Anaplan admin or costly external consultants.
Instead of empowering finance leaders to make changes on their own, the platform often locks them into a cycle of ticket requests and long waits. For organizations that want agility and autonomy, this complexity can be a serious blocker.
User Insights:
“You need a model builder to make even small changes. That dependency slows us down and makes us reliant on outside help.” - TrustRadius Reviewer
Bottom Line:
If your team has the resources to hire or retain certified Anaplan talent, this may be manageable. But for organizations that value self-service and flexibility, the need for specialist skills can introduce bottlenecks.
Anaplan’s pricing varies not just by seat count, but also by the number of use cases and data volumes. This makes it difficult for CFOs and FP&A leaders to confidently budget for the solution, and many find that their total spend grows far faster than expected as they expand beyond finance use cases.
User Insight:
“Anaplan’s pricing can be confusing and opaque. Customers from just 3 years ago may have completely different expectations on pricing, and that can cause friction.” - G2 Reviewer
Bottom Line:
When the pricing model itself is hard to pin down, it adds financial risk to what’s already a major investment.
Anaplan was built for power users, not everyday contributors. It requires a robust back-end with dedicated IT support or heavy reliance on external consultants for finance teams to get up to speed. It’s even harder for departments outside of Finance to find their footing.
Overall, the infrastructure slows cross-departmental adoption and can limit the “connected planning” vision Anaplan is known for.
User Insight:
“Adoption and being self-sufficient is difficult if you don't have dedicated admins due to its legacy platform play. It's too different from spreadsheets, but it doesn't like the natural language formulas in third-gen tools.” - Reddit reviewer
“It’s not intuitive for casual users. Training is required for even simple tasks, and adoption outside of finance is tough.” - TrustRadius Reviewer
Bottom Line:
If a planning tool creates barriers for business partners instead of encouraging participation, you get less value from it.
Not every business can support a platform as robust as Anaplan without a dedicated consultancy or in-house IT department. The good news? There’s no shortage of strong competitors built to solve the same problems—but faster, leaner, and often at a fraction of the cost.
Some focus on Excel continuity, allowing finance teams to maintain familiar workflows while benefiting from stronger governance and automation. Others are browser-native, offering collaboration and scale for global distributed teams. And then there are enterprise-grade platforms designed for organizations that still need robust consolidation and planning but want clearer pricing and faster deployment than Anaplan can offer.
Here are nine of the most reputable Anaplan alternatives to consider in your software research:
|
Tool |
Best For |
Key Differentiator vs. Anaplan |
|
Vena |
Excel-heavy teams scaling planning |
Native Excel interface with enterprise control |
|
Workday Adaptive Planning |
Mid-to-large enterprises needing usability |
Easier to manage without IT; faster deployment |
|
Planful |
Mid-market teams prioritizing speed and support |
Intuitive UI and shorter implementations |
|
Board |
Teams wanting BI + planning in one platform |
Combines FP&A with business intelligence |
|
IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
Large enterprises with complex models |
On-prem or cloud deployment flexibility |
|
Oracle Cloud EPM |
Enterprises already in the Oracle ecosystem |
Full suite including financial close/reconciliation |
|
OneStream |
Multinational enterprises needing consolidation |
Unified CPM with close + planning in one |
|
Pigment |
Teams seeking modern UI and collaboration |
Sleek, intuitive design for cross-department use |
|
Prophix |
Mid-sized organizations upgrading from Excel |
Simpler onboarding and user-friendly workflows |
Vena is a complete planning platform that integrates natively with Excel. In contrast to a basic plug-in, which many corporate performance management (CPM) tools tack onto their solution, Vena allows you to use Excel as your main input interface and benefit from the full and latest features Excel has to offer.
It combines the familiarity of spreadsheets with a centralized database, automated workflows and scalable governance. For teams that don’t want to abandon Excel but need something more structured and robust than standalone spreadsheets, Vena offers a strong balance.
Native Excel interface with two-way sync
Automated workflows for approvals and collaboration
Scenario modeling and what-if analysis
Prebuilt FP&A solutions (budgeting, forecasting, workforce planning, variance analysis)
Audit trails and role-based security
Suite of AI agents for insights and recommendations
Deep integrations with Microsoft 365, NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Salesforce and more
Finance teams that want to scale beyond spreadsheets without rebuilding everything in a new tool
Organizations that need flexibility and support across multiple dimensions, and the ability to add new dimensions easily
Teams prioritizing adoption and usability across finance contributors
While both platforms aim to streamline planning and forecasting, their philosophies differ:
User Experience: Vena keeps Excel at the core, making adoption easier for finance teams. Anaplan requires users to learn an entirely new and proprietary set of formulas and spreadsheet environment.
Implementation: Vena implementations are typically faster and lighter (6-8 weeks), while Anaplan projects often run longer and require consultants even for ongoing use. G2 puts the implementation at 6 months. Anaplan’s website cites that a common practice is a 3-4 phase initial deployment spread out over a year.
Scale: Anaplan’s multidimensional engine is tailored to global, cross-functional planning. Vena, likewise, can support enterprise teams and is structured to scale alongside your business, as you can integrate more use cases with ease.
Cumming Group Drives Global Expansion Through Scalable FP&A With Vena 📈
Cumming Group, a project and cost management consultancy, grew from $50M to $600M in 2024 alone. They needed FP&A systems that would keep pace with the growth, including global dealings and currency translation needs. They relied on Vena to support their global expansion.
Because Vena is Excel-based and owned by Finance, Cumming Group could evolve their FP&A systems with minimal IT dependency. They began by building new templates that mirrored their updated processes, using Vena’s scalable workflow engine to automate reminders and streamline forecasting.
“We’ve been able to double in size while the team has had modest growth to maintain that and really the back-end work is taking care of itself. It’s pretty exciting to be able to double in size and not quadruple in complexity,” says Brian Spence, Director of FP&A at Cumming Group
"The best thing about Vena is that it keeps the familiar Excel interface while adding structure, automation, and governance. Our finance team can still build and adjust models in a way they know, but now every template is standardized and linked to a central database. The workflow approvals make collaboration smooth, and the audit trail gives us confidence in the numbers. I also appreciate how quickly it integrates with our ERP data, which helps reduce manual consolidation and speeds up reporting.” - G2 Reviewer
Vena is a natural choice for teams that want enterprise-grade planning without sacrificing Excel. Unlike Anaplan, which requires steep training and ongoing custom model-building support, Vena leverages tools finance teams already know, while adding automation, control and scalability to keep up with growth.
Workday Adaptive Planning is a powerful cloud-native planning platform that blends advanced forecasting capabilities with ease of collaboration. It boasts AI-driven modeling, real-time data updates, and a design that empowers finance teams to drive insights—without waiting on IT.
Real-time planning and forecasting with prebuilt models
AI-assisted variance analysis and predictive insights
Built-in collaboration across Finance, HR, and Operations
Wide integrations, including ERP and Excel via OfficeConnect; very convenient for existing users of Workday for HRIS
Support for dynamic versioning of budgets and forecasts
Template libraries and scalable modeling tools
Mid-to-large organizations wanting enterprise-grade planning with intuitive usability
Teams needing strong integration with Workday systems—or CRM/ERP tools more broadly
Finance departments seeking self-sufficiency—minimizing reliance on developers or IT for changes
Both platforms target enterprise planning, but their approaches differ:
Ease of Use: Adaptive is generally easier for finance teams to own without relying on technical specialists. Anaplan often requires certified model builders.
Implementation Speed: Adaptive can typically be implemented faster, with less dependency on consultants. Anaplan deployments are more resource-heavy.
Breadth vs. Depth: Anaplan offers more powerful multidimensional modeling across complex, global entities, while Adaptive emphasizes usability and quicker time-to-value.
Interface and Infrastructure: Like Anaplan, Workday has its own proprietary spreadsheet interface and formula language that users must learn.
“The name Adaptive is true. You can change the model as the business changes and needs new KPIs, calculations, etc. It's really a tool that Finance can manage without IT support.” - G2 Reviewer
Workday Adaptive Planning strikes a thoughtful balance between power and usability. Unlike Anaplan—which often requires model-building expertise for even minute updates—Workday Adaptive Planning enables Finance to adapt models on the fly without IT help. It’s a compelling choice for organizations looking to scale actively and thoughtfully.
Planful is a continuous planning platform built to help finance teams move faster and collaborate more effectively across their organization. It focuses on usability, automation and scalability—without the heavy lift that often comes with enterprise-grade tools. Finance leaders often highlight its intuitive interface, strong customer support, and quick time-to-value.
Cloud-native FP&A platform with intuitive user interface (UI)
Automated budgeting, forecasting and financial close workflows
Scenario modeling and rolling forecasts
AI-powered anomaly detection and insights
Workflow automation and audit trails
Integrations with NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Microsoft Dynamics, Salesforce and more
Mid-market and enterprise finance teams seeking faster implementations
Organizations that value usability and strong customer support
Teams that want enterprise capabilities without the overhead of specialist model builders
Speed of Deployment: Planful is generally faster to implement, with less reliance on consultants than Anaplan.
Ease of Use: Its modern UI is easier for non-finance contributors to adjust to, while Anaplan often requires extensive training.
Scope: Anaplan supports deeper multidimensional modeling across global operations, but Planful delivers strong FP&A functionality that’s easier to adopt and manage.
Interface and Integration: Planful offers integration with Excel and Microsoft Office tools—users can embed dynamic reports in Excel, Word, and PowerPoint using its “Spotlight” feature, while the core planning and modeling runs in its cloud platform.
“The best part about Planful is all of the time savings & automation features that come along with it. We've been able to shave hundreds of hours off of our workloads by implementing the software into our organization. It was a quick & easy integration and the majority of our finance/accounting team uses it on a daily basis.” - G2 Reviewer
Planful is a strong alternative for organizations that want speed, usability and scalability without taking on the cost and complexity of Anaplan. It won’t replace Anaplan’s modeling depth for global enterprises, but it delivers a highly effective balance of features for mid-to-large finance teams.
Board is an all-in-one enterprise planning platform that unifies business intelligence (BI), planning, and performance management. Unlike tools that only solve for FP&A, Board gives finance leaders and executives a single environment for financial planning, operational modeling and analytics—reducing the need to stitch together multiple systems.
Unified platform combining BI, analytics, and planning
Drag-and-drop interface with customizable dashboards
Scenario modeling and what-if analysis
Prebuilt applications for FP&A, supply chain and sales planning
Strong governance features, including workflow automation and audit trails
Integrations with major ERP and CRM systems
Enterprises that want planning tightly connected to business intelligence (BI) and reporting
Finance leaders looking for cross-departmental transparency
Organizations that want to reduce their tech stack and manage planning + analytics in one platform
Scope: While Anaplan is primarily a connected planning platform, Board blends FP&A with BI, making it more versatile for teams that want reporting and analytics in the same tool.
Usability: Board’s drag-and-drop design lowers the barrier for casual users. Anaplan often requires model builders and training to drive adoption.
Complexity: Anaplan is stronger for large, multidimensional planning models. Board excels in organizations where planning and BI need to be equally weighted.
Interface and Integration: In a similar vein to Anaplan, Board is a modular platform, meaning you choose the components you need and stitch them together into a custom solution. That means deep configurability, but also longer implementation timelines, more technical upkeep, and a steeper learning curve.
“End users have the option of configuring respective views in the front end, providing maximum flexibility for viewing and evaluating data at any time in real time! Around 120-140 users access the Board application daily for planning, reporting, and forecasting.
The development, implementation, and integration with a Board partner took place quickly and efficiently within a few months.
Customer support from Board and their partners is always available and works in a solution-oriented, fast manner that meets our expectations.” - G2 Reviewer
Board is ideal for organizations that want planning and analytics in a single, user-friendly environment. While it may not match Anaplan’s scale in global scenario modeling, it offers a more accessible and holistic platform for finance teams seeking to unify planning with decision-making.
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by TM1, is a tried-and-true enterprise performance management (EPM) solution. It’s built for organizations that need deep modeling, robust forecasting and enterprise-grade governance. With deployment options both on-premises and in the cloud, it gives larger organizations flexibility in how they roll out and secure their planning environment.
In-memory OLAP engine for high-speed modeling
Advanced forecasting, scenario planning and driver-based modeling
Integration with IBM Cognos Analytics for reporting and BI
Strong governance, role-based access and audit trails
Flexible deployment: cloud, on-prem, or hybrid
API connectivity to ERP, CRM, and data warehouses
Large enterprises with complex, multi-entity planning requirements
Finance teams that need both performance management and BI integration
Organizations in regulated industries that require on-prem deployment options
Deployment: IBM offers both cloud and on-prem options, while Anaplan is strictly cloud-native. This makes IBM a better fit for companies with strict security or regulatory requirements.
Data Modeling: Both support multidimensional modeling at scale, but IBM’s OLAP engine has long been trusted for high-speed calculations on massive data sets.
Usability: Anaplan often feels more modern and collaborative, while IBM’s interface can feel dated without customization. However, it pairs more tightly with IBM Cognos for BI and reporting.
Interface and integration: Has proprietary, multidimensional modeling in TM1 / Planning Analytics, but supports Excel via its “Planning Analytics for Excel (PAfE)” add-in.
“What stands out in TM1 is the ability to model complex business scenarios without relying heavily on external spreadsheets. It brings structure to planning processes while still allowing custom logic, which is especially useful in a fast-paced financial environment.
One downside of TM1 is how unintuitive some of its advanced features can be for new users. Setting up hierarchies or troubleshooting data issues often requires deep platform knowledge, which slows down onboarding and makes knowledge transfer harder within the team.” - G2 Reviewer
IBM Planning Analytics is a strong Anaplan alternative for enterprises that need scale, governance and flexibility in deployment. While Anaplan may offer a sleeker, more modern user experience, IBM remains a trusted solution for organizations requiring secure, high-performance planning environments backed by one of the most established vendors in the market.
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a comprehensive suite that supports financial close, account reconciliation, profitability modeling and enterprise planning. It’s designed for large organizations that need integrated performance management across finance, HR, and supply chain management. With Oracle’s ecosystem, it’s particularly strong for enterprises already running Oracle for their ERP or Human Capital Management (HCM).
Comprehensive suite: planning, close, profitability, narrative reporting
Predictive modeling with built-in AI/ML capabilities
Workforce, project, and supply chain planning
Deep native integrations with Oracle ERP, HCM, and NetSuite
Strong compliance, governance and audit capabilities
Cloud-native with enterprise security
Large organizations looking for an all-in-one performance management suite
Enterprises already invested in Oracle ERP or HCM ecosystems
Finance leaders who want predictive insights and AI-driven modeling
Breadth of Capabilities: Anaplan is focused on connected planning, while Oracle EPM covers the full performance management cycle, including close and reconciliation.
Ecosystem Fit: Oracle EPM integrates seamlessly with Oracle applications—making it a natural fit for Oracle-heavy environments. Anaplan, by contrast, is vendor-agnostic but requires connectors or APIs.
Complexity and Scale: Both tools serve large enterprises, but Oracle EPM is often chosen by CFOs who want a single suite for planning and financial close.
Interface and Integration: Operates via a proprietary, web-native planning and reporting environment. While it supports Excel integration (e.g., via Smart View), its core experience is Oracle’s own interface.
“EPM is useful for consistent consolidation structure and hierarchy management (EDM). It’s inconvenient for modeling with complicated inputs and multi-step calcs, and it's inflexible after you've built it, since changes need to be done in Oracle scripting with admin access. - Reddit user
"It takes time to understand how to use it in the best way and how to get the desired report generated, so we should ensure to make it more user-friendly from the first day of use.” - G2 Reviewer
Oracle Cloud EPM can be an attractive alternative for organizations that want an all-encompassing finance and planning suite—especially those already running Oracle systems. Compared to Anaplan, it’s broader in scope but heavier to implement and has similar challenges around usability and ease of updating, making it best suited for global enterprises with a strong Oracle footprint.
OneStream is a unified corporate performance management (CPM) platform that consolidates planning, reporting, financial close and analytics into a single solution. Unlike point solutions that only handle budgeting or forecasting, OneStream is built to replace fragmented systems across Finance and provide one source of truth for enterprise performance.
Unified CPM platform covering planning, financial close, reporting and analytics
Financial consolidation with strong multi-entity and multi-currency support
Extensible marketplace solutions via OneStream MarketPlace™
Advanced scenario modeling and what-if analysis
Workflow automation and audit trails
Cloud-based, enterprise-grade security
Large, complex enterprises with multi-entity and multi-national operations
CFOs looking to unify financial close, consolidation and planning in one platform
Organizations seeking an extensible system that can expand through add-on solutions
Scope: OneStream offers financial close and consolidation capabilities that Anaplan doesn’t natively provide. Anaplan focuses more on connected planning and scenario modeling.
Flexibility: Anaplan is highly flexible for building models across different business functions. OneStream is more structured, which reduces complexity but can feel less adaptable for non-finance use cases.
Implementation: Both require significant investment, but OneStream deployments often align with financial close transformations, while Anaplan projects are more focused on planning and forecasting.
Interface and Integration: OneStream is built as a unified proprietary EPM platform. It includes Excel add-ins, but much of the modeling and administration requires learning its proprietary environment.
“The consolidation tool has improved our close process by reducing the hours spent, while also improving the level of confidence we have in our monthly results. Finance owns the product and any changes we need to make—we can implement without IT involvement.” - G2 Reviewer
OneStream is a strong choice for enterprises wanting more than just planning—it delivers a full CPM suite with consolidation, reporting and analytics built in. Compared to Anaplan, it’s less about flexible modeling across departments and more about managing the entire financial performance process on one platform.
Pigment is a newer entrant in the enterprise planning market, but it’s quickly gaining traction with finance teams that want a modern, collaborative alternative to legacy systems. With its sleek interface, natural-language queries and strong collaboration tools, Pigment is designed to make complex planning accessible and intuitive.
Browser-native interface with intuitive dashboards and workflows
Scenario modeling and driver-based forecasting
Natural-language search and query for easier adoption
Real-time collaboration across departments
Strong integrations with ERPs, CRMs, and data warehouses
Audit trails and role-based permissions for governance
Mid-market and enterprise teams seeking modern usability and faster adoption
Organizations frustrated with legacy systems that are slow or hard to maintain
Companies that want to encourage broader adoption of planning across finance and non-finance stakeholders
User Experience: Pigment’s interface is more modern and intuitive, making adoption easier across departments. Anaplan is powerful but often intimidating for casual users.
Complexity: Both platforms support multidimensional modeling, but Pigment is praised for its simplicity and ease of building models compared to Anaplan’s complexity.
Market Maturity: Anaplan has a longer track record and larger ecosystem, while Pigment is newer and still building out core capabilities.
Interface and integration: Entirely web-native and proprietary in interface and modeling. Like Anaplan, replicating Excel is not its core—Pigment prioritizes modeling and collaboration via its own platform.
“We started working with it last year, and we love it. I'm the primary owner of the tool (main model builder) at my organization. We automated all of our monthly reports and stuff, creating board views. So, whenever somebody needs the most recent KPIs and financial figures, now instead of pinging the FP&A team, they can go directly to the boards.
I was familiar with Anaplan (was learning it to get certified, but never worked with it as part of my job). Anaplan vs Pigment, I think with Pigment it's easier to build tables and models; however, it lacks some features Anaplan has.” - Reddit User
Pigment is a strong alternative for organizations that want an enterprise planning solution that’s easier to use than Anaplan. It may lack some of the advanced functionality of long-established tools, but its ease of use, adoption speed and modern design make it a considerable challenger in the connected planning space.
Prophix is a cloud-based corporate performance management (CPM) platform built to simplify budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. Unlike heavier enterprise tools, it emphasizes ease of use and fast adoption, making it a practical choice for finance teams that want to modernize beyond spreadsheets without taking on Anaplan’s complexity.
Web-based interface with drag-and-drop reporting
Automated budgeting, forecasting and financial consolidation
Scenario modeling and what-if analysis
Workflow automation with audit trails
Prebuilt templates for finance workflows
Integrations with ERP systems like Microsoft Dynamics, NetSuite and Sage Intacct
Mid-market finance teams seeking a step up from manual spreadsheets
Organizations that want fast onboarding and intuitive workflows
Teams with straightforward planning needs that don’t require enterprise-scale multidimensional modeling
Ease of use: Prophix is easier to learn and adopt; Anaplan often requires dedicated training.
Implementation: Prophix implementations are shorter, while Anaplan projects demand more time and consultants.
Scale: Anaplan is better suited for global, multi-entity planning, whereas Prophix is ideal for more straightforward use cases.
Interface and integration: Offers Excel add-in via the “Contributor / Analyzer” functionality, enabling users to add inputs in Excel to support the budgeting process, but its core interface is web-based and proprietary.
“Prophix is very easy to use (both for those that work in finance and outside of finance); the company offers great customer support and is always available when we have issues, and we are excited that Prophix is continuing to invest in additional features (such as AI). We look forward to all the great things we will continue to do with this tool!
I think the dashboards could use some improvement (we do most of our graphs in Excel due to the limitations in Prophix), some reports are not very usable right when they are downloaded and require manipulation in Excel, and it would be great if we were able to access invoices/other support directly in Prophix rather than having to go outside of the tool.” - G2 Reviewer
Prophix is a strong fit for finance teams that want simplicity and speed. It’s not designed to match Anaplan’s scale, but it delivers reliable planning and reporting for mid-sized organizations.
According to The Association for Financial Professionals (AFP), 71% of FP&A professionals use an EPM tool at least quarterly—but most still underutilize their systems. That’s a clear signal: adoption, ease of use, and flexibility matter just as much as functionality.
While Anaplan is a market leader for connected planning, it isn’t always the best fit for every team. Its scale, cost, and complexity can be overkill for organizations that need agility, transparent pricing, or faster time to value.
But today, finance leaders can choose from a wide range of platforms designed to meet different needs:
Excel-first solutions like Vena, which preserve the familiarity of spreadsheets while adding governance, automation and control
Browser-native challengers like Pigment, built for speed, collaboration, and usability across departments
Enterprise suites like Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning, OneStream, IBM Planning Analytics, and Oracle Cloud EPM, which deliver the scale and governance needed for global, multi-entity operations
Balanced platforms like Vena, Planful, Prophix, and Board, which prioritize usability and faster time-to-value while still offering enterprise-grade functionality
The right choice depends on where your organization is today and where it’s headed. If your goal is to scale without complexity, look for platforms that deliver governance without steep learning curves. If you need global consolidation and multidimensional modeling, invest in enterprise-grade systems with proven track records.
Ultimately, choosing an Anaplan alternative isn’t about replacing features line for line. It’s about finding the platform that best aligns with your team’s size, workflows and growth strategy.
Curious how Vena would work for your team? Request a demo to see it in action.
.svg)
Request a demo to see how Vena can support your complete planning processes.
Schedule DemoNicole Diceman is Director, Product Marketing at Vena. With a proven track record of driving product strategy and direction, she is heavily involved in driving new product ideas and development efforts and is closely aligned with customer needs and requirements. With her extensive knowledge and experience in product marketing, FP&A and the Vena platform itself, Nicole is a regular contributor to the Vena blog and often speaks at virtual and in-person events to share her ideas. A powerful advocate for product marketing innovation, Nicole is always on the lookout for creative new ways to bring additional value to Vena customers.
