Learn how Vena reduces budgeting, reporting, and analysis times by 50%.
Static budgeting is a simple and straightforward approach to planning an organization’s finance. However, in 2024 many CFOs think static budgets are a thing of the past because static approaches are viewed as being rigid and finance teams prefer more flexing rolling methods. But there’s more to it than that. This guide will define static budgeting, provide examples and weigh up the pros and cons against other types of budgeting methods.
A static budget is defined as a financial plan that does not change over the budget period, regardless of variations in business activity levels.
The budget remains fixed. They allow businesses to measure performance by comparing actual results against budgeted figures.
Static budgets are used when income and expenses are predictable and stable. These budgets are suitable for small businesses, fixed operations and short-term projects where variables do not change much over time. They're also common in administrative or office settings where costs are expected to remain consistent.
Consider a company that sets a static budget for the fiscal year with projected sales of 10,000 units at $20 each, totaling $200,000 in revenue. The budget also includes $50,000 for raw materials, $30,000 for labor and $20,000 for overhead costs, aiming for a profit of $100,000.
The budgeted figures remain constant for comparison, regardless of actual sales during the year.
Static budget variance is the difference between actual results and the budgeted figures. This difference can be favorable or unfavorable, depending on whether the actual outcomes exceed or fall below the expectations.
Analyzing these variances helps businesses assess performance levels, identify discrepancies and take corrective actions.
You can use a template – such as our Free Budget vs Actual Excel template to analyze the difference between actual and budgeted results.
So why are static budgets used, and what are the benefits?
Finance professionals can enhance accountability across departments and teams through static budgets. Here are some of the key benefits:
Static budgeting excels in providing a clear snapshot of a company's financial activity, including expenses sales, and revenue. By having predetermined figures for these categories, management can continually monitor and compare real-time financial data against these static projections.
This ongoing monitoring enables quick identification of variances, facilitating rapid response to ensure that financial activities stay aligned with budgetary expectations.
By establishing a fixed financial framework at the outset, companies have a solid reference that embodies their financial goals and resource allocation for a specific period.
This blueprint helps to steer managerial decisions, investment choices and operational adjustments in a direction that supports the company's broader strategic ambitions.
By matching anticipated revenue with planned outgoings, a static budget enforces a disciplined approach to managing expenditures where every dollar spent is accounted for and has already been earned or forecasted to be earned. This makes it an effective tool for maintaining positive cash flow.
This disciplined approach is essential for sustainable financial health, as it safeguards the company against cash shortages that can result from unchecked spending.
While beneficial, static budgets are limited by their inflexibility.
One of the main criticisms of static budgeting lies in its rigidity. Once a static budget is set, it does not account for unforeseen changes in the market or the economy. This can be problematic when businesses face volatility, as the budget remains fixed even if revenues fluctuate significantly. This inflexibility can lead businesses to miss out on growth opportunities or fail to react adequately to unexpected threats.
Similar to how static budgets struggle with external market shifts, they also fail to accommodate internal changes effectively, such as increased efficiency, strategy adjustments and staffing changes.
With the budget being set in stone, there is little scope for reallocating funds to different departments or projects that may require more support, potentially stunting innovation and adaptation within the company. This can also lead to discouraging proactive management.
When the actual performance of the company deviates from a static budget, it can be difficult to determine whether the variance was due to good management or simply changes in the market conditions.
This makes it challenging to measure managerial effectiveness accurately, as the static budget serves as a less-than-perfect benchmark for assessing performance.
So with that, how do you create a static budget? This 3-step process makes it simple:
1. Start by deciding the budget's time frame.
2. Estimate the expected level of output or sales, then forecast revenues and expenses based on this activity level. Ensure all potential income sources and costs are included for a comprehensive financial plan.
3. Finally, compile these figures into a document for implementation and reference.
Unlike static budgets, flexible budgets adjust according to actual output or revenue levels. Flexible budgets offer a dynamic budgeting approach, adapting to fluctuations in business activity. The choice between static and flexible budgets depends on the business nature, with static budgets preferred for their simplicity and ease in comparison, and flexible budgets valued for their adaptability.
Read Customer Story
In summary, static budgeting is a straight forward financial planning method. Despite the limitations, their simplicity and clarity can be highly beneficial for businesses with predictable operations. However, it is important for businesses to choose between static and flexible budgets based on their strategic goals and operational dynamics.